Tuesday, February 26, 2013

R.I.P. EGM Feb 05, 2009 7:03PM PST


I was surprised to learn that EGM had shuttered and found out after receiving the last issue.  No wonder the next one never came!
I grew up reading EGM and still have many back issues stored at my mother's.  I think the earliest issue I have is number 7. 
What I cherish most about EGM was it's unwavoring judgement.  The staff was dedicated to giving the most impartial reviews possible, even if it meant waiting an extra month.
There were many dull gaps in my life - work breaks, car rides, plane flights, etc - that EGM filled with entertainment, and for that they will be missed.

Comments (1)


  • EGMforever1989
  • I <3 EGM!

    Posted: Oct 06, 2009 12:00AM PST by  EGMforever1989
    as if you couldnt tell ;)

To Switch or Not To Switch Is now the time to hop on the PS3 bandwagon? Mar 16, 2010 9:01PM PST


I've owned a 360 since '06 when it was an affordable choice over the PS3.  Since then I've enjoyed playing many great HD games.  The Halo series, Gears of War, Dead Rising, RE5 are all great gaming experiences well worth the price of admission.
Now that the initial wave of HD anticipation has passed, my personal interest in the 360 is waning.  There are no "must have" titles coming out in the near future that excite me.  I enjoy some of it's multimedia features like file sharing, and Xbox Live is a great online experience, but I now perceive the 360 as a system on the decline.
My Live subscription will be active until this winter so I have plenty of time to decide to make the switch.  Is now the time to sell my Xbox 360 and invest in the PS3?  To me, the timing seems right.  What would you do?  Does anyone have any advice to give?

Comments (2)


  • schm0
  • It's Always Time

    Posted: Mar 17, 2010 12:00AM PST by  schm0
    The approximate time to jump on the PS3 "bandwagon" was in 2006, when the system made it's debut. Cool
    In all seriousness, and in the interest of dousing the fanboy flames before they spiral out of control, I will merely highlight some of the pros of the PS3 for you:
    1. Blu-ray, Blu-ray, Blu-ray. This will be the video standard for the next 5-10 years.
    2. PS3 Exclusives: Little Big Planet, Metal Gear Solid 4, Demon's Souls, God of War I-III, Gran Turismo, Heavy Rain, Infamous, Resistance, SOCOM, and Uncharted. Check the ratings onmetacritic or here on 1up.com if you like.
    3. Free PSN and online play. No subscriptions. (The tradeoff being less features, currently.)
    4. Built-in Wifi
    5. Sleek look and better cooling in the PS3 Slim
    6. The CELL processor, which is not even fully utilized in nearly all games, and is only recently being used to its fullest. (http://tinyurl.com/ykgezpdhttp://tinyurl.com/yzbye7n)
    Those are just a few off the top of my head. Don't get me wrong, I've read all about the XBOX and know what it's capable of as well. It all depends on what you want out of your system. The XBOX Live online system has tons of features that leave us PS3 fans drooling, but I wouldn't trade my PS3 exclusives for any of them. Anyways, that's just my two pennies. Good luck!
    Flag | Reply | Delete
  • DeeTee
  • Maybe, maybe

    Posted: Mar 18, 2010 12:00AM PST by  DeeTee
    I keep prevaricating about jumping into the current generation of consoles. PS3 does seem to have three exclusives I wouldn't mind trying out (Heavy Rain, Demon's Souls and the Uncharted games), but not much beyond that.
    I'm thinking of hanging off until the next generation comes out, which I assume will be next year sometime, and getting on the boat then.

    That said, I will probably do my normal thing of saying "No, no, it won't happen", and then accidentally find myself buying both.

1 - A Blog a Day for 30 Days Feb 27, 2011 7:01AM PST


At various times over the past fews years I stumbled upon the random member's blog entry in the "A Blog a Day for 30 Days" challenge.  I found it clever, wanted to give it a try, but kept putting it off...
...until now.  In fact, you are reading my first blog in the challenge:  a blog about the "A Blog a Day for 30 Days" challenge.
As I write this, I wonder if I'll have enough things to write about for 30 days straight.  Having enough material to write about seems to be the toughest aspect of the challenge.  Indeed, I've come across blogs that read something like "Day 15.  Not much happened today.  Not sure what to write about.  Just entering this as a blog to keep up with so-and-so and continue the challenge".
I intend to avoid such a blog at all costs.  Surely there must be enough random topics and events in my life upon which to contrive something interesting and entertaining.  I generally keep my opinions to myself, but I imagine I can open the spicket for the sake of digital print.  Perhaps the well is overflowing.
Furthermore, I could use the cranial exercise.  Insightful and enlightening conversation has evaded me as of late.  Facts are fleeting.  Guesses are golden.  I am a minnow that has escaped the roaring tide of the American Mainstream Neurologically Eternal Stupification Insertion Agenda (or AMNESIA  for short) and plan on never going back, which is a form of amnesia in its own right.
My strategy going forth is to keep each blog simple and direct.  I'm sure blog burnout comes easy to those who shoot their load in a few early epic million-word diatribes of gushing mindbarf.  
The main obstacle I foresee is time.  I'm taking this challenge very seriously, and would hate it if lack of time pestered me into missing a blog, whether it be on the 5th, 9th, or even 13th day.  However, if such be the case, I pray that all 3 of my avid "A Blog a Day For 30 Days" groupies will forgive me.
Also, it must be one blog per day!  This is a contingency I lay upon myself.  If you happen to read a blog that is cut off in midsentence, lacking conclusion or any plausible reason for it's abrupt ending, rest assured that the clock hath struck midnight and my blog-a-day ether for that day has been expended.
So, here we go.  A blog a day for 30 days!  Woohoo!  Please feel free to share any comments, criticism, and reactive mindspew!  I could use the motivattion.  Enjoy!

D

Comments (2)


  • BrokenH
  • I was doomed from the start

    Posted: Feb 27, 2011 12:00AM PST by  BrokenH
    For me I don't even look to a list. To do so makes me feel bound and limited. However I'm not the best to ask. I knew from the onset I couldn't meet the quota so I simply kept blogging to socialize with friends & for the sheer enjoyment of it.
    In the future I hope a challenge focuses on the quality of blogs as opposed to the quantity. I find "more" isn't always better.
    However this challenge serves a good purpose. Aka it makes gamers socialize on a regular basis which is ALWAYS a plus!
    Flag | Reply | Delete
    • Raised_on_Nintendo
    • RE doomed

      Posted: Feb 28, 2011 12:00AM PST by  Raised_on_Nintendo
      LOL @ doomed from the start.  That is partly why I obstained for so long, I wasn't sure if I was ready for it.  Lately, there's been a lot on my mind so I figured now would be a good time to start blogging and release some thoughts.
      Personally, I think people should blog more often.  It's good mental exercise.  I enjoy reading different styles of writing.  
      As for challenges of quality, have you checked out bitmob.com?  I don't visit regularly, but I saw some challenges like that at the site.
      Take care. 

2 - I Am Gamer Feb 28, 2011 8:32AM PST


I've been a gamer as early as I can remember.  Whenever a game was being played, I wanted to be a part of it.  I wanted to figure it out, learn its strategy and find a way to win.
For me, gaming goes beyond electronic gaming.  Board games, card games, word games and sports are all included within my sphere of gaming.  
Eventually, during periods of coming-of-age introspective existentiality, I asked myself why.  Why do I like games so much?  
1 - They are interactive.  Every type of game involves some sort of interpersonal interaction.  While this is obvious with sports and multiplayer games, the same is true even with a single player experience.  Someone created the game.  The game creators' ideas are what's being competed against.  Although it's not quite the typically direct personal experience of a multiplayer game, I'm sure if a serious gamer was ever to rub elbows with a game developer and strike up a conversation, the opinions and insight that are shared would be more passionate than average.
2 - They present problem solving situations.  Every game, whether it be chess, Resident Evil, football, or Go Fish, has some sort of logicality to it that must be mastered in order to succeed.  They test your problem solving capabilities on some level, depending on difficulty.  Personally, I prefer a higher than average level of difficulty in the games I play.  Usually, simpler games rely more on random luck to gain an advantage than actual ability, rendering a player's intelligence a moot point.
3 - They are stimulating.  Narrowly escaping the clutches of a zombie horde, nailing the final kill in an online death match, kicking a last second field goal, or beating a boss with few remaining hit points usually provokes a reaction of relief, joy, celebration, or even fear.  Moments like this are what I appreciate most about gaming.

3 - Andrew Jones Mar 01, 2011 7:15AM PST


I recently discovered the artwork of Andrew "Android" Jones and am highly impressed.  A couple of his pieces really speak to me.  His work is so detailed and beautiful, I scratch my head in amazement as to how he accomplishes it.  I am slightly embarassed that it took so long for me to discover him.
Here's some of his work:
Mubarek Down 

Comments (2)


  • BrokenH
  • Cool digs

    Posted: Mar 01, 2011 12:00AM PST by  BrokenH
    These are really good. I wish I was better at going for "meaningful" or "gritty realism mixed with sci fi" but my stuff ends up cartoony by comparison. The "Down" piece in particular is likely something many don't want to see but need to. I'm not saying America sucks as a whole but parts of it really need a revamp! 
    Flag | Reply | Delete
  • Raised_on_Nintendo
  • RE:

    Posted: Mar 01, 2011 12:00AM PST by  Raised_on_Nintendo
    On a purely financial scale, I agree @ revamp.  The finance industry is directly to blame for the current recession.  It is out of control and I don't see any sign of that changing.  The "Down" piece is in reference to the ousting of Mubarek from Egypt.  Not sure what Jones is inferring by including the American flag in there.  Maybe that we need a similar ousting?  A new revolution?

4 - Carlos Estevez Mar 02, 2011 1:13PM PST


By now, I'm sure many of you have caught some wind of the drama surrounding the life of Carlos Estevez, aka Charlie Sheen.  I normally prevent such scandalous Hollywood subjects from entering my conscious, and if ol' Carlos didn't break his silence by appearing via radio interview on my favorite radio show/padcost, "The Dan Patrick Show", I wouldn't be giving it a second thought.  
First, I was amused by how the tabloids took that interview and ran it completely out of context.  If you've ever partied then you can tell that Carlos is a party animal.  His personality screams party.  He is quick-witted and honest, almost to a fault.  Let me get this straight, though.  I'm not defending the guy.  I'm just stating my observations.
After that interview I didn't go out of my way to learn any more until I heard he did an video-recorded interview with TMZ.  TMZ?  That sounds like a poorly thought out move on Charlie, I mean Carlos' part.  Why TMZ?  Don't they make a living on criticizing and exploiting celebrity scandel?  I had to watch the interview to compare notes with my opinion of Carlos from the DP show interview.
In all honesty and fairness, I couldn't care less about what Carlos does in his spare time.  I take him at his word that he is sober.  I'm going through my own bout with sobriety at the moment, and it's actually pretty easy if the right motivation is in place.  
In my opinion, his drug habits aren't what caused his eccentric personna, it was his upbringing in the Hollywood celebrity culture that paved the way for his effortless entry into the lifestyle of excess.  Maybe there was a time that Carlos actually had to try at something significant.  Maybe at one time he needed to actually look for work instead of the work looking for him.  What's that saying about adversity building character?
Here's a question I have: Has Carlos hurt anyone?  No?  Then leave him alone.  "Oh, but he's setting a bad example for society to follow."  Really?  Believe it or not, there are folks who don't watch TV, go to the movies, or read ridiculous gossip rags.  Ask someone in Tibet what they think of Charlie Sheen.  "Isn't that the guy who's always mopy and down on his luck?"  No, that's Charlie Brown.  And if he's setting a bad example, why are all of these journalists tripping over themselves in pursuit of his story.  Shouldn't they be ignoring him?
Here's the big kicker for me.  Hundreds of headlines and news blurbs have been reported about Charlie Sheen and his decadent lifestyle.  I wonder how many total man hours have been spent on this story alone.  However, what has Charlie Sheen done that directly effects your life?  Has he stolen from you?  No?  Well, guess what, there are folks living behind the scenes that steal form you every day, folks who would treat you far less kindly than Charlie Sheen ever would.  They live just as decadent a lifestyle as Sheen, if not more, and they do it on your dime.  They're called politicians, bankers, and economic advisors, just to name a few.  How come we rarely hear about these people?  How come nobody has an opinion about this?  Why aren't we scrutinizing their every move like we do Sheen's?  If you think that mainstream media isn't used to hide the truths of elite power mongers, you are sadly misguided.  Are we starting to see just how distracting and pacifying mainstream media can be upon the modern population?  Are you starting to understand that this is intentianally done to keep you in the dark?  Wake the fuck up!  If your intrigue is scandalous affair, leave Sheen alone and direct your attention somewhere more appropriate that actually effects you.  Or are you too scared?  Are you too stupid?
Lastly, I just want to say that Sheen looks terrible, physically.  I think he's making a fool of himself and needs to go incommunicado.  What he does from there isn't my business, nor should it be yours.  Have a nice day.

Comments (1)


  • BrokenH
  • Agree

    Posted: Mar 02, 2011 12:00AM PST by  BrokenH
    Charlie never screwed with me so we're on good terms. All I care about is that he never killed or molested anyone when under the influence and that all the females he banged were 100% willing! Beyond that it's water under the bridge and I could really care less about his personal life.

5 - iPods Mar 03, 2011 7:08PM PST


For two months I've been the proud owner of an iPod Touch.  It's a first generation 8G model.  I bought it second hand, it has a few dings and scratches, and it fills my mp3 playing needs just fine.
I'm impressed at what this little handheld device can do.  It's basically a mini computer that fits in your pocket.  What features it lacked were easily added when I successfully jailbroke it on the first day of ownership.  
With the jailbreak, I can use my iPod as a portable flash drive.  It's not as convenient as a typical flash drive.  I can't simply plug it into a USB port and transfer files.  It requires the use of a file transfer protocal program that actually transfers files back and forth from the iPod over wireless internet.  
Also, the iPod can now display pdf files.  This means I can download an ebook, transfer it to my iPod using an FTP program, and read at my discretion.  
Of course, no jailbroken iPod owned by a gamer would be complete without a videogame emulator.  I tried out a few emulators, and the ones that work the best are the NES, Genesis and Gameboy emulators.
Even without these features, the iPod still plenty of value with it's Apple OS limitations.  There's tons of free apps to satisfy most entertainment needs.  Personally, I enjoy the podcasts.  I listen to them more than anything else.
The verdict on whether or not jailbreaking an iPod effects it's stability is still in question.  I've noticed a couple of glitches with some programs, mainly opening an app and having it fail to boot.  Today, while trying to open a podcast, it glitched pretty bad.  I was able to open the podcast after retries and some lag, but my mp3's were nowhere to be found.  Was it due to the jailbreak?  I can't say for sure.  
In any event, I'm glad I bought the iPod and will be using it regularly for a long time.

6 - The Singularity of 2045 Mar 04, 2011 4:17AM PST


Last month Time magazine ran an article entitled "2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal".  It outlines how the rate of technology advancement is increasing at a steady curve, and that 2045 is the year in which AI will be superior to that of humans.  It will mark a time when machines will be able to recreate themselves both physically and intellectually.  The notion is that when this occurs, humans will no longer be the dominant species, and a wave of major conscious change will transform the global mindshare.
This also means that by that time we will presumably have a way to create our own Matrix-like reality.  We will somehow be able to upload our conscious into a program of some sort and continue to exist there articifially for infinity.
My first argument is about whether or not a machine can exhibit a true human conscience.  I understand that a binary code can emulate such a thing, full of logic statements and communication cyphers, but could it really think on it's own?  Could such a machine develop morality?  Sense of self?  I mean more than the if/then statement of "if I exist, then I'm alive", "if my aluminum alloy appendage is ruptured, then I'm in pain", or a basic moral code similar to something like the ten commandments.  Sometimes the rules need to be broken.  Could a machine make it's own desicions?  Could it love, hate, or be jealous?  Would it drive past 55?
Next, I challenge the idea of humans being capable of achieving immortality, even in an AI scenario.  I'm not saying that I wouldn't enjoy it, I just doubt that we will somehow be able to transfer our minds onto a computer chip.  I'll believe it when I see it.
As for robots being able to reproduce themselves on their own, I believe that's possible.  I've seen my share of dancing robots and mainframes win at Jeopardy to see that glimmer on the horizon.  It's a coming.
And as for singularity, I think there are some people who have already acheived that mindset.  What we endure today is a battle of the mind and spirit, and there are those who've already transcended that, at least to a working degree.  Nobody is perfect.  I'm sure even Buddha had a bad day every once in a while.  I think the question is can singularity of the mind be achieved across the board.  For this, I am doubtful.




Comments (1)


  • BrokenH
  • Dave

    Posted: Mar 04, 2011 12:00AM PST by  BrokenH
    Computer viruses reproduce. Glitches in code can create whole new patterns. We're getting pretty close to this paradox!
    Btw I really want to get Singularity. Been hearing it's pretty good and Raven studios has rarely let me down! (You're talking about the true terminology but there's supposedly a great sci fi FPS bearing the same name. lol.)

7 - Current Favorite Game Mar 06, 2011 4:10PM PST


When I find a game that I like to play I tend to approach it with intensity.  I don't back down.  I don't pretend to lose to make my opponent feel better about themself.  There are plenty of other hobbies that exist to achieve self-worth.
If someone would've told me a few years ago that I would be playing Texas Hold'em on a regular basis, I would've laughed, not because the game itself is not worthy of my time, but because I don't like to gamble.  I heard enough horror stories of people losing fortunes over gambling to keep me out of that lifestyle.
It started with the poker boom of 2003, when an amature poker player named Chris Moneymaker (yes, that's his real name) won 2.5 million dollars in the WSOP Main Event.  Hold'em was televised regularly on ESPN, and I started to watch, interested in the rules and somewhat confused with the terminology being tossed around.  
It took numerous invitations for me to finally give in and play a game for money with my friends.  Like I said, I don't like to gamble, but playing for money is the only way to play poker.  It gives players incentive not only to play the game, but to take it seriously.  
I lost in that first game, but I was already hooked.  I had to learn more.  I had to become a winner.  Enter online poker into the scene.
There aer numerous advantages of playing online poker.  You can play at any time.  The games play faster, allowing more hands to be played.  There are games available with buy-ins as low as 2 cents.  Multiple games can be played simultaneously.  Playing online is where I really started learning the game on a higher level.
I eventually became a winning player.  Of course, I had to lose a little and learn my lessons the hard way.  Indeed, playing poker is a gamble, and an important lesson to learn is how to manage a bankroll.  A player who properly manages their bankroll should be able to keep playing without losing any money in the long run.
What I enjoy most about Texas Hold'em is its balance and ability to host as many players as can be accomodated.  Most card games have a maximum limit of 4 players, whereas Texas Hold'em is limitless, granted you have enough room, chips and cards to meet the demand.  My weekly home games have averaged around 15 players over the past couple of months.  For someone who's competitive like me, it's a dream come true.   The money doesn't mean anything to me.  Well, maybe it does a little...

8 - Thoughts About the State of the Videogame Market Mar 07, 2011 12:57AM PST


So here I am on my 8th blog, at a videogaming website, and just now beginning to address my thoughts that directly pertain to videogames.  Suffice to say, this is somewhat reflective of my current interest in videogaming as a whole.  Don't get me wrong, I still play.  I recently finished Mad World, Link's Crossbow Training, consumed all things Dead Rising, and am vigilantly working towards a 100% score at Super Smash Brothers: Brawl.  The thing is there's nothing new that excites me, and it's been that way for a while.  In some ways, I was let down by this generation of consoles.
I eagerly anticipated this generation of gaming.  HD graphics.  Motion controls.  Improved online interface.  I couldn't wait to exprience this, and I bought a 360 and Wii early in their cycle.
Things started well enough.  Wii Sports was a party game sensation.  Halo 3 and Gears of War were played regularly.  Mario Kart Wii delivered a fantastic 12-player online experience.  The first 2 years of this generation were the most enjoyable years of my gaming life.  Then things started to change.
My first grievance is with Xboxlive.  Does anyone understand how it's leaderboard works?  Why do some players with worse stats rank higher than others?  It doesn't make sense to me.  
Then came the cheaters.  Leaderboards were hacked.  Modded systems made their way onto the playing field.  People began messing with their router to glitch a game and notch a cheap victory, or leave at the last second to avoid a loss, or worse, credit me the loss when I was ahead.  And let's not forget those wacky glitch exploits.  Players I know who never used exploits were getting their records reset, undue punishment from their game developer overlords.  This ruined the experience for me to the point where I can't take it seriously anymore.  Why get excited for an online experience when I know it's going to get warped by exploits that throw off the balance?  
The motion control market which started strong on the Wii with Wii Sports and a handful of other games eventually went under-utilized.  The Wii went the route of Nintendo's handhelds, getting dumped with subpar shovelware, guided by the Wii's superior market penetration filled with parents who buy cartoon brand name items for their kids and new gamers who don't properly research a game before buying it.  I'm sure many b-rate developers made a killing on the Wii.  But where's the next motion controlled killer app?  Did Nintendo already give up on that?
As the videogame market became more lucrative, the business itself has changed.  To meet the bottom line many companies merged or were bought out by the likes of EA and Activision.  The market is dominated by these wannabe monopolies, and in my opinion it's stifling the spirit out of it.  Due to this, I am honoring an active boycott of both EA and Activision.  I can't blame everything on the publishers, though.  The market is what it is, and we live in a capitalistic society.  There's always going to be people with money to spend, and some of that will be on crap games.  So be it.
Another factor that plays in my waning interest is the fact that the bar for quality has been set tremendously high.  In older generations we had better graphics, sound and playability to look forward to in the future.  As it stands now, there isn't much room for improvement on a technical scale.  How much better can the graphics and sound get?  The market of 3D visuals is in its infancy, but will it be enough to generate interest in the next generation of consoles?  Will there even be a next generation?  The main area of improvement is now in ideas, and, from I've seen, it's the simpler indie game developers who are carrying that torch.
Having said all of that, I can't fathom a day when I completely lose interest in videogames.  I'm actually pretty excited to try the 3DS.  I have hope for 3D gaming.  Maybe I'm too much of a perfectionist, or too distracted by poor market standards to appreciate the recent masterpieces that have come along.  Maybe my personal standard of quality is too high.  I just think that the current generation could, or perhaps should, be better than it's been.

Comments (2)


  • BrokenH
  • I feel it too

    Posted: Mar 07, 2011 12:00AM PST by  BrokenH
    I'd say my time spent with the PS2 was my favorite era in gaming. Once I got to the Xbox 360 I was a tad put off by dlc schemes,rushed games riddled with bugs,and having to pay for Live. True, it isn't always thorns. There are some great titles still dotting the lanscape. It's just the business side of gaming screams "greedy cash grab" with more frequency now than it did in the past.
    Flag | Reply | Delete
    • Raised_on_Nintendo
    • I hear you

      Posted: Mar 08, 2011 12:00AM PST by  Raised_on_Nintendo
      Honestly, I'm a bit hypocritical in my stance against monopolies as Nintendo held one during the days of 8-bit gaming.  They ruled it with an iron fist, employing strict licensing guidelines for anyone releasing games on their system.  I think competition is a good thing, and it's allowed for faster increase in quality.  If Nintendo had it's way, we may very well be stuck in a previous generation of consoles as Nintendo milked out every last penny that they could.  
      I agree with the dlc cash grabs.  There are too many map pack, weapons packs, etc that could easily be included on the original disc.  That's why I'm very choosy about what games I buy nowadays, and a major reason why I stick with Nintendo.